?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Ben Robble-Robbler. - Sauce1977 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Sauce1977

[ Userinfo | Sauce1977 Userinfo ]
[ Archive | Sauce1977 Archive ]

Ben Robble-Robbler. [Jan. 23rd, 2006|06:00 pm]
Sauce1977
[Tags|]
[In the Moment |War.]
[Special Music |Michael Jackson - Smooth Criminal]





Ben Roethlisberger . . . Rollie-Fingered.

The Hamburglar . . . Ben Roethlisberger?!?



What's the difference between Ben Roethlisberger . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . and the Hamburglar?

I don't know. They both steal things.

Any year . . . but this year.

Fuck 'em.


LJ is a virus.


linkReply

Comments:
From: steakumms
2006-01-24 02:36 am (UTC)
The Steelers in the Super Bowl is pretty much my worst nightmare. Only a Steelers-Redskins Super Bowl could possibly be worse. The legion of terrible towel-waving douchebags will be even more insufferable now.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-01-24 02:42 am (UTC)
I'm sure the tardedness will rise like baking soda and 7up.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: steakumms
2006-01-24 03:23 am (UTC)
At least I don't have to deal with them in my hometown. You might want to take a vacation for, like, two weeks or so.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-01-24 03:31 am (UTC)
Every fucking day, "Bettis comes home" . . .

Fuck.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2006-01-24 07:58 am (UTC)
Really? I hadn't heard... (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/2006/01/23/gallery.superbowlheadline/index.6.html)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: steakumms
2006-01-24 07:58 am (UTC)
fuck. that was me. fucking livejournal's new "security" features fuck me on a daily basis.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-01-24 08:27 am (UTC)
Yeah, that shit needs to be ironed out . . .

If you're living in the Detroit area, it's been non-stop for about 24 hours now, the "Bettis goes home" bullshit.

Fuuuuuuuuuuck that shit. He left a loooooooong time ago . . . . plus, Reggie deserved a Finals championship last year, just because.

You know how this crap gets played. Nobody, however, was talking that bullshit in Week 17.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-01-24 09:30 am (UTC)

PS

Plus, consider a little bit of this for the AFC, then consider a little bit of that for the NFC, and in an era where stats serve two purposes . . . helping everyone make more sense of it all plus making a ton of sporting action pretty fucking predictable, consider that by these numbers, there's some major crow that Steelers fans may actually be missing, if one was a Steelers fan, and one was trying to make their case, if one believed in SOS, given the fact that the Steelers just beat all three top seeds.

Personally, I don't care as much for SOS, but what it still looks like, to me . . . a perfect fucking storm in massive favor of the Steelers.

Anyone who said they should have done this, including Steelers fans, is literally defying the odds.

I can't help but get suspicious, mighty suspicious, even, not at the lack of dominance of the three top AFC seeds . . . not at the likely dominance, by the recent results, of the Steelers . . . not even down, in fact, on the Seahawks . . . more like, I'm wondering what the hell happened to the other teams more than I am wondering anything else.

I'm starting to wonder if this Steelers run, merely, is a giant batch of wonderful dumb luck.

When I say they'd have to win 10 more championships (either team, or the Lions, or whoever), I'm not saying it just because I hate 'em. That part of it's a giant embellishment.

I am, however, completely not in favor of this 2005 Steelers team, and I think their SB XL appearance is harmful to the vision of all fans, not just the delusional Pittsburgh homers.

I do think, however, Vegas has the right team favored, considering the general nonsensical outcome of the 2005 NFL Playoffs.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: steakumms
2006-01-24 05:28 pm (UTC)

Re: PS

Unfortunately, I can see the Steelers winning this game big. Really, what's the difference between the 2005 Seahawks and the 2005 Colts, other than the Colts are more talented? I can see this being one of those Super Bowls where both teams come out really tight and not much happens until the last few minutes of the first half, then they sit in the locker room for an hour, and then the Steelers come out and dominate a shell-shocked Seahawk team in the second half. Put me down for 38-13. Unless, of course, they find Jerome Bettis in some seedy card room in the slums at 3am the night before the game, which is entirely possible.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-01-24 05:54 pm (UTC)

Re: PS

I hate to say it, but I've been fighting the evil balance in my heart to the point where something truly sordid about the Steeelers or one of their 'key' players would really make me almost smile.

What's also pissing me off . . . royal piss-offing, even . . . is the odd assumption that people from Detroit should welcome the Steelers and by some strange osmosis, well, they should take them as their own.

There's an extreme inbalance to this, as if the Seahawks do not fucking exist . . . that the Steelers are supposed to just show up and get the championship . . . which, to me, of course, I look at that, and like everything that looks like that to me, I just whack it down, just like that Whack-a-Mole game.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-01-24 06:26 pm (UTC)

DOUBLE-PLUS PS

Plus, "Big Ben," the nickname of . . . Ben Robble-Robbler, was already taken.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2006-01-24 07:39 am (UTC)
i love the mustache. why doesn't the hamburglar have one?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: anthrogeek
2006-01-24 07:40 am (UTC)
that was me.

i've logged on twice already and it doesn't stay that way. sheesh!!!!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-01-24 07:47 am (UTC)
Yeah, LJ had a hiccup.

I meant to smear Ben Robble-Robbler, not the Hamburglar, though I think I cheapened the McDonald's character by association.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)