?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Tests Appeal to the Selfish. - Sauce1977 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Sauce1977

[ Userinfo | Sauce1977 Userinfo ]
[ Archive | Sauce1977 Archive ]

Tests Appeal to the Selfish. [Apr. 21st, 2006|07:30 am]
Sauce1977
[Tags|, , , ]



I can't get enough of them, lately.



This bullshit I just did on OK Cupid slam dunks me as a 'Provacateur.'

Don't agree?

Up yours!


the Provacateur

(57% dark, 38% spontaneous, 47% vulgar)

your humor style:
VULGAR | COMPLEX | DARK


You'll crack on anything, and you're often witty, even caustic, about it.

Therefore, your sense of humor is polarizing. You're transgressive, and you've got a seriously sharp 'edge'--maybe too much for some folks. If they get you, people think you're one of the funniest (and smartest) people in the world. If they don't, they think you're an ass. Whatever, right? While some might question your judgement, your comic intellect is unquestionably respected.

PEOPLE LIKE YOU: Chris Rock - Lenny Bruce - George Carlin




The 3-Variable Funny Test!
- it rules -

If you're interested, try my best friend's best test: The Genghis Khan Genetic Fitness Masterpiece




My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:


free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 59% on darkness

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 31% on spontaneity

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 71% on vulgarity
Link: The 3 Variable Funny Test written by jason_bateman on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test





There's a 2-variable intuition test on OK Cupid.

Take this test, located here.

Why should you take it? Fuck me, you ask and curse?

I know every correct answer.

Don't worry, on first try, I scored right near the middle, in the upper right unusually-smart box.

Let me know how you did.

linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: pierce
2006-04-21 11:57 am (UTC)
on first try i scored a "40% SCIENTIFIC INTUITION and
70% EMOTIONAL INTUITION"

i scored "higher than 3% on Scientific and scored higher than 61% on Interpersonal."

i'll have to re-take it.

which girl killed themselves? the non-virgin one was funny, considering that two of the girls were wearing crosses.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 06:27 pm (UTC)
Holy shit.

I didn't notice that about the three girls.

I chose the left one (correct) because she was not as forced on the camera, plus makeup.

That's weird, huh?

Through trial and error, I'll send you the answer key.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 07:36 pm (UTC)
Sent.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: hulagalinthesky
2006-04-21 12:02 pm (UTC)
Very Well-Rounded



You have:
62% SCIENTIFIC INTUITION and
62% EMOTIONAL INTUITION
</b>

The graph on the right represents your place in Intuition 2-Space. As you can see, you scored above average on emotional intuition and above average on scientific intuition. (Weirdly, your emotional and scientific intuitions are equally strong.)

Your Emotional Intuition score is a measure of how well you understand people, especially their unspoken needs and sympathies. A high score score usually indicates social grace and persuasiveness. A low score usually means you're good at Quake.

Your Scientific Intuition score tells you how in tune you are with the world around you; how well you understand your physical and intellectual environment. People with high scores here are apt to succeed in business and, of course, the sciences.


Try my other test!
The 3 Variable Funny Test
It rules.






My test tracked 2 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:


free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 30% on Scientific

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 36% on Interpersonal
Link: The 2-Variable Intuition Test written by jason_bateman on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2006-04-21 06:27 pm (UTC)
That's pretty much what I got.

I'll send you the key, if you wish.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: hulagalinthesky
2006-04-21 06:30 pm (UTC)
bring it
bring the key, I say
give me the key, or give me death
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 07:33 pm (UTC)
It's been sent through LJ.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: hulagalinthesky
2006-04-21 08:01 pm (UTC)
Got it!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 06:28 pm (UTC)
whoops, dat's me
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: steakumms
2006-04-21 01:59 pm (UTC)
That one put me in the Cutting Edge category, along with Dave Letterman (yay!) and John Belushi (booooo!)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 06:30 pm (UTC)
Both guys are jawsome.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: steakumms
2006-04-22 02:54 am (UTC)
If by "jawsome" you mean "more awesome than Ron Jaworski", then yeah.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 07:33 pm (UTC)
Lemme know if you want the key to befuddle others with your superior senses.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: steakumms
2006-04-22 02:55 am (UTC)
No no, that's alright. I'm fine with my inferior senses, really.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: zboson
2006-04-21 04:48 pm (UTC)
Wow, I got 62% Scientific and 70% Emotional. That's odd because I have always considered myself far more scientifically-grounded than that. Also, I'm terrible at reading people. The ones with the photos of people? I guessed for the most part because I had NO idea. Though for the virgin question I picked the girl with the least amount of makeup on. For the suicide girl I picked the girl who had sad eyes even though she was smiling and pretending to be happy.

They should let us know what the answers are.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 06:32 pm (UTC)
That's what my best buddy got, for real.

Of the three, I figured the non-virgin was the one with less-pronounced makeup and/or not exactly forcing a gigantic smile.

Also, my feelings were thrown for a loop on 15. Something like that just happened to someone in my family, with their friend.

I'll send you the key.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 07:36 pm (UTC)
Sent.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: zboson
2006-04-21 07:42 pm (UTC)
Oh awesome, thanks!

Hm, I guess I WAS right about that, and the other thing.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 07:44 pm (UTC)
The emotional were the last 10 qs. It was easier for me to pin down the answers to the first ten through Google searches.

For me, and 15, I guessed incorrectly. Something like that happened to someone I know . . . with their buddy, recently.

The reality for that Q . . . there isn't always a plausible reason for someone to do that, and people are known to make gigantic mistakes.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: zboson
2006-04-21 07:55 pm (UTC)
I guess the idea is to see if you can pick up on subtle emotional cues people give off in their expressions, gestures, etc... it's hard with a photograph and much easier with watching people move and speak.

Like I said the girl on the left had sad eyes, she seemed to be smiling without her heart being in it. No, you can't always tell if people are suicidal but when people get to that point it's fairly obvious that something is wrong. Doesn't mean they're going to act, but it's hard to act completely normal when you're in that much mental or emotional distress. It's just that people who are close tend to get so used to them being that way that they come to think of it as normal, or don't know what to do about it, or sometimes are in denial. Besides, people who actually intend to die do not tend to talk about it or give cues. Those who do usually are asking for help - they want to be talked out of it or prevented from hurting themselves.

I got the kiss wrong. The one about the man and woman having sex or not - well, they didn't seem like they were interacting with each other in the intimate way that lovers do. I got the "wave" one wrong, too.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 08:02 pm (UTC)
I have experienced that actual situation in my own photos.

When snapping pictures of people I know in pictures with bunches of people you don't know, in the background, someone more often than not will notice that, in those few seconds you're setting up for your forced-smile pic with friends, that they're going to be on camera.

They will do exactly what that guy did.

You like to take photos, and the Miami set were great. If you set up for a shot with people, just wait for a few seconds in an area, especially one where a crowd will all but notice you taking the time to set up your shot.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-21 07:51 pm (UTC)
I'm responding to too many people at the same time. I just repeated myself to you, lol.

Time to ease off the LJ for the evening.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: musicsdaughter
2006-04-22 07:17 am (UTC)
I got 40% SCIENTIFIC INTUITION and 70% EMOTIONAL INTUITION too.

Send to me the key!!! I am full of curiosity!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2006-04-22 07:20 am (UTC)
Sent!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)