?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Election 2008: Note on Michigan Primary Results. - Sauce1977 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Sauce1977

[ Userinfo | Sauce1977 Userinfo ]
[ Archive | Sauce1977 Archive ]

Election 2008: Note on Michigan Primary Results. [Jan. 16th, 2008|11:45 pm]
Sauce1977
[Tags|, , , , ]
[Current Location |Detroit, MI, USA]
[Special Music |The YouTube in Question]



With no choice other than the official "Clinton" vs. "Uncommitted" for Democrats, Hillary Clinton won Michigan against the two-headed 'other' monster, 55 percent to 40 percent.

Most Democrats minus Hillary Clinton chose to ignore Michigan results due to the punishment doled out by the Democratic Party, which stemmed from Michigan's move of the primary date ahead of the usual schedule.

Also, many Michigan voters chose to ignore the vote. Less voters than usual turned out for this primary, due to reasons such as this is bullshit 'weather.'

Mitt Romney won the Republican race over John McCain, 38 percent to 30 percent, respectively.

Some Democrats chose to vote on the Republican candidate. It happens.

Quoted from here:

Michigan has open primaries and no registration by party, so voters choose on primary day which partisan contest to vote in. In 2000 with no Democratic race but for an eventual blowout in caucuses three weeks later, many Democrats voted in the Republican primary — totaling 17 percent of that electorate, more than in any other GOP primary exit poll since at least 1992.


I find this about the 2008 Michigan Primary from the Detroit Free Press:

Among self-identified Democrats voting in the Republican primary

(accounting for 7% of total)

McCain 41%

Romney 33%


Romney could still lose the Republican ticket, but if I was a Republican, then I would choose the Republican candidate that lost the race among Democrats.

If I was a Democrat, then I would vote for whom I was sure would lose to the Democratic candidate in the 2008 Election. After all, my party left me with no real choice due to the delegate punishment, so therefore, I'd figure I'd try to throw off my Republican enemies friends by voting for a sure loser, with intent to make it easier for my Democratic candidate-to-be.

If Romney had lost this primary, then most accounts predicted that his campaign for President would have ended in Michigan. Since he did not lose, it will continue.

There is no guarantee that Romney or Clinton will win eventual party nomination. Michigan, not unlike other states, has a habit of voting on stupidity bias, such as when Gerald Ford received the win in Michigan in the 1976 Election.

I take McCain's support among such Democrats as a clear possibility of his eventual loss to Romney, however.

As for Hillary, kudos for winning a state where only you chose to run despite the penalty handed out by your party.





linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: thecesspit
2008-01-17 06:15 am (UTC)
I can't quite work out how Michigan divides it delegates between the voters and areas in the State. The republican delegation was also cut in half for running it's primary early, something Michigan Republicans seemed happy with in return for getting an earlier slot.

I don't think Romeny was dead if he lost this this state. He got a good share in Wyoming and Iowa. But the press being what it is, they'd have had a field day. Plus they want a big hitter to drop out. More column inches! No-one whose caught the eye so far in the mainstream will drop until after Super Tuesday.... I'm guessing John Edwards, Gravel and Kucincinch in the Democrat, Fred and Rudi in the Republicans. The three 'main' republicans will probably keep splitting the vote for a while.... though I love Huckabee has Chuck Norris.

(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2008-01-17 06:17 am (UTC)
Yeah, the idea that Romney was dead if he didn't win Michigan seems funny, but people take great zeal in knowing that if you can't win a "home state" (due to his dad being a former MI Gov), you can't win because nobody there likes you so why should I . . .

Because we totally elect Presidents at times based on how we like them and if they fall into our demographic.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: thecesspit
2008-01-17 06:20 am (UTC)
Yeah, but does he support the Lions, Tigers and Pistons?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sauce1977
2008-01-17 06:23 am (UTC)
I think he drinks Brawndo.

I think they all do.

The links won't last on YouTube, but Idiocracy is closer to today than we think.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)